Teaching your teams to make the most of AI at work.
They already use these tools. Few can tell a sound answer from a confident wrong one, because nothing in the output marks the difference. Myelin builds that judgement, in person, at three levels.
Mitochondria builds agentic AI systems for enterprises. We teach this because we build it.
Wrong answers arrive looking like right ones.
The cost surfaces later. A figure that was invented, guidance that had gone stale, a decision nobody can account for when a client asks.
Seniority is no defence
Automation complacency, the habit of checking a system less often than the work requires, appears in expert and inexperienced people alike. It grows under competing demands on attention, which is to say it grows on a busy day. Awareness of it changes little.
Two errors, not one
Machine advice produces errors of commission, where someone acts on a recommendation that was wrong, and errors of omission, where someone misses what the system never raised. The second is quieter and harder to catch, since nothing in the work shows that anything was missed.
So we build the sessions around practice. People work through answers that look sound and are not, until checking becomes reflex.
Five competences, taken further at each level.
What a participant can do afterwards, and can be seen doing.
The Myelin Check
Four questions, asked of any output before you act on it.
Find the source. Check the claims appear in it, and that it is current. A confident sentence with nothing beneath it is the common failure here.
Ask what a good colleague would have raised. Systems answer the question put to them, so the risk sits in the one nobody asked.
Set the answer aside, reach your own view, then compare. Reading first and judging afterwards leaves one answer on the table.
The system logs what it did. Only a person can say why they accepted it, and that is the part anyone will ask for later.
In the body, myelin is the sheath that wraps a nerve fibre. It insulates the path and keeps the signal consistent, so what travels along it arrives faster and intact, and it grows stronger with repeated use.
Myelin does the same for judgement at work. The sessions layer method and technique onto the knowledge your teams hold, allowing system capabilities to be efficiently extracted, reducing business risks.
The sessions are built to stick.
Teaching stays focused. The Check is applied to prepared outputs, considering the context of everyday work constraints.
Better in the room than in front of a client. Exercises use work that reads well on a first pass and falls apart on a second.
Everyone leaves with the Check and the worked examples from their own function. Optional quarterly check-ins with us.
Choose a level by what people do with the answer.
Using it, judging it, or answering for it. We sort this with you on the scoping call, and most organisations run two.
For everyone working with these tools day to day. All five competences at working depth, and the Check practised until it runs without prompting. Participants leave able to say what the tools on their desk decide and what they leave to a person.
For those whose work turns on evaluating what a system produces. Longer exercises, harder material, the failure patterns in detail. Participants leave able to defend a decision to accept or reject an answer.
For those who set policy and answer for it. Disclosure, oversight, and the questions worth asking before a system is approved. Closes with a written position the organisation can stand behind.
Every competence in every room, taken further at each level.
Simple to book, simple to run.
A scoping call, a date, a room. Sessions run in person on a fixed curriculum, so there is nothing to design and nothing to approve. Exercises come from the work itself: a summary drafted for a client, a supplier's reply, a set of figures, a policy question. We write them by function, so the strategy room and the sales room handle different material, and we keep them current as the tools and capabilities evolve.
If your sector or your own processes would suit material shaped around them, we are glad to build that. Mention it on the call and we will scope it separately.
That record also supports ISO/IEC 42001 clause 7.2, should your organisation be working toward the standard.
Sushrut Munje, co-founder and lead facilitator
We build on these platforms and see new capabilities early, so the curriculum keeps pace with what lands on your desk.
Mitochondria is a member of the NVIDIA Inception program and of the OpenAI Partner Network, and participates in Microsoft for Startups, Google for Startups Cloud, Claude for Startups and the Sarvam Startup Program.
The first cohorts are being scheduled.
We have been building this for a while and are looking forward to the first rooms. Dates, sizes and fees follow shortly.
Launching soon