Where senior judgement is the constraint, we add capacity. Where it isn't, we remove the wait.
Mitochondria builds agentic systems that work alongside your sales team. The system takes the work between meetings: reading inbound enquiries, drafting proposals in your format, walking considered buyers through their decision, booking active prospects into the calendar. Senior judgement stays with your senior bench. Four engagements completed, with an active-sales pattern in deployment.
Request a walkthrough →One agentic layer, many shapes of work.
Different inputs in. Different outputs out. The same agentic layer in between, holding context and routing the judgement calls. The network below shows what flows through the system across the engagements we run.
Multi-modal inputs feed a shared agentic layer. The layer holds the context, makes the calls it can, and escalates the ones that belong with a senior. Different outputs emerge depending on the workflow.
Most B2B sales cycles lose deals between meetings, not at the table. The rep is closing. The system around the rep is what's slow.
A colleague your team works with.
Mitochondria's products are multi-agent systems. They operate the way a senior sales operations team would, if it ran around the clock and held every conversation in memory. Seven shifts arrive on day one.
Faster first responses. Faster quotes. Faster costing. Considered buyers walked through their decision and active ones booked into the calendar. Without losing the judgement of your senior bench.
Where the work has already moved.
Four engagements, anonymised. Plus one pattern in active deployment. The bottleneck in every case had sat with the leadership for years before we arrived. Mitochondria's system resolves it without taking judgement away from the senior bench.
Complete technical offers, with configuration advisory, on a custom electrical category.
The cycle that used to take three weeks now takes five minutes. The output is not just a faster first reply; it is the full technical offer, with recommended product configuration, drawn from enquiry inputs received across modes: PDFs, photos of site conditions, handwritten notes, screenshots, scanned spec sheets.
This is the step before negotiation. Compressing it means the buyer gets to a confident answer faster, the rep moves to the commercial conversation sooner, and the cycle as a whole moves at the speed of the buyer's interest. Senior engineers stay in the loop on the cases that genuinely need their judgement.
Vetted leads, quoted at the speed of intent.
Vetted inbound leads were arriving ready to buy, and waiting days for a quote because the senior who knew the substitution rules was on a call. The system now generates quotes in the company format within five minutes, against a catalogue of over five hundred SKUs, with the right stakeholders on cc and standard attachments included.
Reps moved up the cycle. Negotiation, relationship, and close stay where they belong. Brand voice stays consistent across every quote, regardless of which rep is on the case.
Costing evaluations, without the bench dependency.
Costing evaluations depended on a small bench of senior engineers whose reasoning lived in their heads. The agentic system now sits alongside the engineer working an evaluation, structures the brief, asks the targeted questions a senior would otherwise need to discover, and assembles the costing output. Stage one of the cycle moved from weeks to days.
A second outcome arrived without being designed for. Every decision the team makes through the system is captured, building an organisational record of how decisions get made. The bench's reasoning is now queryable; new engineers can ask how similar evaluations have been handled before.
Considered purchases, conversed into decisions.
Mutual funds, insurance products, loans, and other considered categories share a sales pattern. The buyer is deciding, with weight on the decision. They want the product explained. They want their goal heard. They want a recommendation that has thought about their situation. They want the consequences walked through alongside them. Most digital sales journeys collapse this into a form. The system holds the conversation instead.
Across deployments with a leading AMC, with mutual fund distributors, and with adjacent work in lending and insurance, the system explains the product, plans against the buyer's stated goal, advises on personal finance where relevant, and works the conversation toward a confident decision. Across web and WhatsApp, in the customer's language, with the brand's voice steady.
Interest, converted into a meeting.
Some sales cycles don't close in a chat. The buyer wants a conversation, but the deal closes elsewhere: a test drive, a site visit, a showroom appointment, a sales call. The middle of this cycle is where most digital journeys lose people. An enquiry that no one returned. A product question that went unanswered. An appointment request lost to a queue.
This is where the system runs the active sales conversation through to a meeting on the calendar. It qualifies the prospect, answers product questions across variants and configurations, explains finance options, and books the appointment. By the time your rep walks in, the meeting context is with them: what was asked, what landed, where the hesitation sat. The conversation that built the interest carries into the conversation that closes it.
Worth asking.
How does this work with our CRM?
Mitochondria's systems connect to your CRM through its API, read what they need, and write the records your team needs to see. The CRM remains your single source of truth for pipeline and account data. The agentic system runs alongside, doing the work the CRM was never built to do.
What happens to our sales reps' roles?
They move up the cycle. The work that gets automated is the work reps tend to dislike: assembling proposals, chasing missing information, writing quotes from scratch. What remains is negotiation, relationship, judgement, and close. The reps we've worked with describe the change as having a sharp junior colleague on call.
What happens when the system gets it wrong?
Escalation rules are explicit and configurable. Some workflows start conservative, with a human reviewing every output before it goes out. Others start broader, with the system running autonomously on cases it has handled correctly hundreds of times, and escalating only the edge cases. Every output is auditable. Every correction your team makes is captured.
What does the data flow look like?
Documents and conversations are processed transiently, encrypted in transit and at rest, through our cloud infrastructure. Your customer data, transaction records, and the system's accumulated reasoning sit within your environment. The data handling terms are documented in our DPA, aligned with GDPR, UK GDPR, and DPDP.
Can we start with one bottleneck before expanding?
Yes. Most engagements start with the single bottleneck your team feels most acutely. Once that workflow is live and producing trusted output, the second workflow gets configured on top of the same underlying system. The captured reasoning from the first informs the second.
What does it cost?
Pricing is structured around the engagement, not per seat. The range depends on the complexity of the cycle, the volume of inbound traffic, and the depth of the reasoning you want captured. We share specifics on the walkthrough.